Assessment on the Effects of Intercropping Patterns on Incidence and Damage to Cotton by Diaparopsis Castanea: Hampson (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in Magoye, Mazabuka District of Zambia

M. Chijikwa; P.O.Y. Nkunika; B. Siamasonta

doi:10.53974/unza.jonas.1.2.355

M. Chijikwa University of Zambia, P.O. Box 32379, Lusaka, Zambia
P.O.Y. Nkunika University of Zambia, P.O. Box 32379, Lusaka, Zambia
B. Siamasonta Cotton Development Trust, P.O. Box 670057, Mazabuka, Zambia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.53974/unza.jonas.1.2.355

Keywords: Diaparopsis castanea, Cotton, Intercropping effects, Magoye, Southern Zambia

Abstract

The Red bollworm, Diaparopsis castanea (Hampson) is an insect that has gone from being a minor cotton pest to being a major pest of cotton in Zambia. This study was conducted in Magoye, Mazabuka district, Zambia to assess the effects of intercropping patterns on the incidence and damage caused to cotton by D. castanea. The first part of the study involved conducting a survey among 80 randomly selected farmers in Magoye to determine the different types of intercropping patterns being used in the area. The second part of the study was an experimental field study to assess various intercropping patterns identified in the survey. The experiment was laid out in a randomized block design with four replications. Cotton cultivar CDT II (Gossypium hirsutum) was sown by hand in 100-cm spaced single rows. The intercrops selected were maize (Zea mays L.), sorghum (Sorghum vulgare L.) pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan L.), cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.) and sunflower (Helianthus annus L.). The data collected was subjected to analysis of variance (ANOVA) technique and LSD using GenStat discovery edition 3 computer package. The survey revealed that only 28% of farmers in Magoye area were using intercropping as a pest control strategy. The intercrops were grown either as a strip/single row pattern alongside the cotton crop or in between each row of cotton. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) on the field study showed significant differences (F =2.22; d.f =5; p<0.001) in incidence of D. castanea egg, average damage to cotton bolls (F = 1.25; d.f = 5; p<0.001) and average seed cotton yield (F =1.17; d.f = 1.17; p<0.001) across the various intercropping patterns

References

1. Adu-Gyamfi JJ, O Ito, T Yoneyama & K Katayama 1997. Nitrogen management and biological nitrogen fixation in sorghum / pigeon pea intercropping on Alfisols of the semi-arid tropics Soil Science and Plant Nutrition 43:1061-1066.
2. Braun M 1991. IPM Training Manual: Tanzanian German IPM project GTZ.PPD. Chinyanga, Tanzania.
3. Capinera JL, TJ Weissling & E Schweizer 1985. Compatibility of intercropping with mechanized agriculture: Effects of strip intercropping of pinto beans and sweet corn on insect abundance in Colorado. Econ. Ento. 78:354-57.
4. Cromartie WJ 1981. The environmental control of insects using crop diversity. In:CRC Handbook of Pest Management in Agriculture, Boca Raton.
5. De souse HFA 2007 Effects of strip intercropping of cotton and maize on pest incidence and yield in Morrumbala District, Mozambique Afr. Crop Sci. Conf. Proces.8:1053-1055.
6. Dent D 1991 Insect Pest ManagementRedwood Press Ltd. UK
7. Hill DS 1983. Agricultural insect pests of the tropics and their control. 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press , United Kingdom.
8. Hokkanen 1991 Trap cropping in pest management. Ann. Rev. of Ent. 36:119-138.
9. Jalloh A 2001. Promoting appropriate intercropping technologies for sustainable agriculture production in Africa: A farmer centered approach Institute of Agricultural Research, Sierra Leone.
10. Mamogobo MD 2008. Intercropping cotton with grain sorghum and pigeon peas for bollworm control Tshwane University of Technology: Department of crop science, South Africa.
11. Mohammad MK., GMS El-din & AA Hosny 1991. Evaluating three patterns of intercropping cotton and forage cowpeas. Ann. Agric.Sci. Moshtohor, 29: 1269–84.
12. Munro JM 1987. Cotton . Longman group, UK
13. Paterson AH 2009. Genetics and Genomics of Cotton. Springer. New York
14. Pearson EM 1958. The insect pests of cotton in Tropical Africa CIE, London.
15. Perrin RM 1977. Pest management in multiple cropping systems Agro-Ecosystems3:98- 118.
16. Pimentel D & N Goodman 1978 Ecological basis for the management of insect populations Oikos 30:422-37
17. Prasifika JR., PC Krauter, KM Heinz, CG Sansone & RR Minzenmayer 1991 Predator Conservation in Cotton: Using Grain Sorghum as a Source for Insect Predators. Biol. Cont. 16 (2): 223–229.
18. Russell D 2004. Insect Pest Management for least Developed Countries. In: Horohz AR & I Ishaaya (eds). Insect Pest Management: field and protected crops. Springer-Verlog Berlin Heidelberg Pp 141-179.
19. Shelton AM & BA Nault 2004. Dead-end trap cropping: a technique to improve management of the diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae) Crop Prot. 23:497–503.
20. Thacker JRM 2002. An introduction to Arthropod pest control Cambridge university press, UK
21. Van den berg H, MJW Cock, GI Odour & EK Onsongo 1993. Incidence of Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera.: noctuidae) and its natural enemies on smallholder crops in kenya. Bull. of Ento. Res 83: 321- 328.
22. Virk JS, KS Brar & AS Sohi 2004. Role of trap crops in increasing parasitation efficiency of Trichogramma chilonis Ishii in cotton. J of Biol. Control 18:61–64.
23. Williams MR 2006. Cotton losses: 2005 In: 2006 proceedings of Beltwide Cotton Conference (National Cotton Council) Pp 1151-1204, South Antonio, Texas.