Reproductive Biology of Mouth-Brooding Tilapiines in the Kafue Flood plains

T.S. Chikopela; H.G. Mudenda; C Katongo

doi:10.53974/unza.jonas.1.2.359

T.S. Chikopela Department of Biological Sciences, University of Zambia, Zambia.
H.G. Mudenda Department of Biological Sciences, University of Zambia, Zambia.
C Katongo Department of Biological Sciences, University of Zambia, Zambia.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.53974/unza.jonas.1.2.359

Keywords: Tilapiines, Reproduction, Gonadosomatic index, Kafue Floodplains

Abstract

Invasive alien species have become a serious threat to the biodiversity of ecosystems of the world. Globally, the threat to biodiversity due to invasive species is considered second only to habitat loss. Invasive species are thus a serious impediment to conservation and sustainable use of global, regional and local biodiversity. This study concentrated on the reproductive biology of the Oreochromis species in the Kafue Floodplains, which is part of the Kafue River stretching from Itezhi-tezhi to the Kafue Gorge. Specific objectives for this study were to compare reproductive strategies i.e. egg size and Gonadosomatic Indices of the introduced Oreochromis niloticus and the local breams, Oreochromis andersonii and Oreochromis macrochir. Oreochromis niloticus is an invasive species that has been reported to cause a reduction in abundance of fish which are closely related to it due to its highly competitive nature. In this study, the egg sizes were noted as longest in Oreochromis niloticus measuring 1.825 ± 0.1892mm followed by Oreochromis andersonii with 1.696 ± 0.3117mm and Oreochromis macrochir had the smallest, which measured 1.4483 ± 0.777mm. The Gonadosomatic Index was highest in Oreochromis niloticus at 1.034 ± 0.0816 followed by Oreochromis macrochir with 0.918 ± 0.1332 and Oreochromis andersonii with 0.783 ± 0.0107. In all three species, the females had a higher Gonadosomatic Index than the males and the fish in the ripe gonad maturity stage also showed a higher Gonadosomatic Index value than the other stages. Though only six months of data were collected for Gonadosomatic Indices, distinct spawning peaks for all three species were noted as November and January for Oreochromis andersonii, October and December for Oreochromis macrochir and November through December and March for Oreochromis niloticus. From the results, it can therefore be concluded that larger egg sizes and high Gonadosomatic Index of Oreochromis niloticus compared to the other mouth-brooding tilapiines, Oreochromis andersonii and Oreochromis macrochir contribute significantly in giving it a competitive advantage. It is therefore recommended that the introduction of Oreochromis niloticus into the Zambian river systems be revised based on the findings from this study.

References

1. Admassu, D., 1996. The breeding season of tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus L. in Lake Awassa (Ethiopian rift valley). Hydrobiologia 337: 77-83.
2. Analytical Software, 2009. Statistix 9 User’s manual. Analytical Software. Tallahassee, USA.
3. Audenaerde, D.F.E.T., 1994. Introduction of aquatic species into Zambian waters and their importance for aquaculture and fisheries. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. ALCOM Field Document No 24.
4. Bagenal, T.B, and Tesch. 1978a. Age and growth; in methods for assessment of fish production in Freshwater. 3rd edition, No. 3, Blackwell Scientific publications Ltd. pp. 101-136.
5. Barnabè, G., 1994. Biological basis of fish culture. Aquaculture: Biology and ecology of' cultured species (ed. G. Barnab6 & F. I-1orwood). New York. pp. 227-372.
6. Boulenger, G.A. 1909-1916. Catalogue of freshwater fishes of Africa in the British Museum (Natural History).
7. Bromage. N.R., 1995. Broodsiock management and seed qual it. Jo Broodstock management and egg and larval uual it. N. R. Bromage and R..J Roberts (Eds). Blackwell Science 1.11. Oxford. UK. pp.1—24.
8. Canonico, G.C., A. Arthington, J.K. McCrary and M.C. Thieme, 2005. The effects of introduced tilapia on native biodiversity. Aquatic conservation: marine and freshwater ecosystems. Aquatic Conserv: Mar. Freshw. Ecosyst. 15: 463–483.
9. Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, E.T. LaRoe, 1979. Classification of wetlands and deepwater habitats of the United States. U. S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, D.C. Jamestown, ND: Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center Home Page. http://www.npwrc.usgs.gov/resource/1998/classwet/classwet.htm (Version 04DEC98).
10. De Vlaming , V.L., 1974. Environmental and Endocrine control of teleost reproduction. P13-83. In: C.M. Schreck (Ed), Control of sex in fishes Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. Virginia Polytechnic Institute-Sci. 74-01. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg.
11. de Vlaming, V., G. Grossman and F. Chapman, 1982. On the use the gonosomatic index. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Vol. 73A, No 1: 31-39.
12. FAO, 2005a. Aquaculture production. 2003 year book of fishery statistics-Vol. 962. Food and agriculture organisation of UN, Rome, Italy
13. Gómez-Márquez, J.L., B. Peña-Mendoza, I.H. Salgado-Ugarte and D. Ramirez, 2005. Reproductive biology of Oreochromis niloticus (Perciformes:Cichlidae) at Emiliano Zapata dam, Morelos, Mexico. Rev. Biol. Trop. 53 (3-4): 515-522.
14. Kefi, A.S., N. Chimba, C. Kancheya, and D.C. Mumba,2010. Reproductive biology of the three Oreochromis species Oreochromis andersonii, Oreochromis macrochir andOreochromis niloticus: Implications for fish farming development in Zambia. Zambia.
15. Komolafe, O.O. and G.A.O. Arawomo, 2007. Reproductive Strategy of Oreochromis niloticus (Pisces; Cichlidae) in Opa Reservoir, Ile-Ife, Nigeria. Rev. Biol. Trop. (Int J. Trop. Biol ISSN-0034-774) Vol 55(2); 595-602.
16. Lowe (McConnel), R.H., 1958. Observations on the biology of Tilapia nilotica L. in East African waters. Rev. Zool. Bor. Afr. 57:129-170.
17. Marshall B.E., 1979. Fish population and fisheries potential of Lake Kariba. S. Afr. J. Sci.75:485-488.
18. Nikolsky, D.V., 1963. The Ecology of Fishes. Academic, London.
19. Payne, A.I. and R.I. Collinson, 1983. A comparison of biological characteristics of Sarrotheroden niloticus with those of Sarrotheroden aureus and other tilapia of the delta and lower Nile. AqCul. 30:335-351.
20. Redding, J.M. and R. Patino, 1993. Reproductive physiology. In: D.H. Evan (Ed), The physiology of fishes. CRC Marine Sciences server. Press. Inc. Florida; USA. Pp 503-534.
21. Sargent, R.C., P.D. Taylor, M.R. Gross, 1987. Parental care and evolution of egg sizes in fish. Am.Nat.1987;129:32-46. 10.1086/28421.
22. Schwank, E.J., 1994. The introduction of Oreochromis niloticus is spreading on the Kafue floodplains, Zambia. Hydrobiologia journal. 143-147.
23. Shendge, A.N., B.A. Pawar and J.M. Jaralli, 2011. Status of gonads in relation to total length (TL) and GSI in freshwater catfish Notopterus notopterus (Hamilton) from Bhima river, Maharalitra. J. Exp. 2001. India Vol 14, No. 1. Pp 157-160.
24. Shipton, T., D. Tweddle and R.M. Watts, 2008. Introduction of the Nile Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) into the Eastern Cape Eastern Cape Development Corporation.
25. Simpson, A.C., 1951. The fecundity of Rainbow TroutSalmo qairdneri. J. Fish. Res. Bd. Can. 19: 1-27.
26. Skelton, P., 2001. A complete guide to the freshwater fishes of southern Africa. Halfway House,South Africa, Southern Book Publishers.
27. Tweddle, D. and R.M. Wise, 2007b. Nile Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). In Wise, R.M., B.W. van Wilgen, M.P. Hill, F. Schulthess, D. Tweddle, A. Chabi-Olay, and H.G. Zimmerman, 2007. The economic impact and appropriate management of selected invasive alien species on the African continent. Final Report prepared for the Global Invasive Species Programme. CSIR Report Number CSIR/NRE/RBSD/ER/2007/0044/C, Appendix 3: 43 pp.
28. Zambia Department of Fisheries and Research Gillnet survey Manual and Guide 2008.