Sustaining Social Licence to Operate Using Community Engagement: A Case of Konkola Copper Mines - Nchanga, Zambia

L. Mazyopa; Peter R.K. Chileshe

doi:10.53974/unza.jonas.3.1.465

L. Mazyopa Konkola Copper Mines plc
Peter R.K. Chileshe School of Mines and Mineral Sciences, Copperbelt University, Kitwe, Zambia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.53974/unza.jonas.3.1.465

Keywords: Social License to Operate, ommunity Engagement, Trust, Social Infrastructure, Procedural, Fairness

Abstract

The mining industry has both positive and negative impacts on their host communities. Therefore, it is not enough for mines to only rely on the legal licence, but instead, they need to nurture a trust-based relationship with the community called ‘Social License to Operate’ (SLO). The main objective of the study was to examine how ‘Social License to Operate’ can be developed and sustained using community engagement between Konkola Copper Mines - Nchanga Mine (KCM) and the communities within 10 km radius from the mine operations in Chingola, Zambia. The conceptual and theoretical framework of the study was grounded in the ‘Relative Deprivation Theory’ and the ‘Social Identity Theory’. The methodology of the study was qualitative and delved into a contemporary stakeholder risk issue affecting KCM. Therefore, data in the form of voice recordings and field notes was collected through 28 semi-structured interviews out of an estimated population size of over 28,000 households from five research sites, namely, Chiwempala, Nchanga North, Kapisha, Lulamba and Shimulala in Chingola that sufficiently demonstrated data saturation in the participants’ responses. From data collected, analysis and interpretation, through ‘Thematic Content Data Analysis’, three themes emerged which were adopted as variables of ‘Trust’; ‘Social Infrastructure’ and ‘Interactional Trust’ which deals with the quality and quantity of engagement while ‘Procedural Fairness’ looks at how the mine’s stakeholder engagement and grievance mechanism procedures contributed towards building a mutual relationship with the community. Of the 28 participants, 34 per cent benefitted from the mines through access to income generation while the remainder were negatively impacted through unemployment, poor community infrastructure, high moral decay, poor social services delivery and environmental pollution. Further, 69 per cent complained of lack of engagement and only 7 per cent expressed satisfaction on how their complaints were resolved. Further 67 per cent did not share any relationship with the mine. Key findings, based on this research, were that KCM – Nchanga Mine has a mixed ‘Social License to Operate’ because four townships accepted the company while one township strongly felt that they do not share any relationship with the mine as they had not benefitted from the mineral wealth naturally entitled to them. The conclusion was that it is cardinal for mines to develop a highly active collaborative relationship with the community as a pathway to sustainable mining. The recommendation was that lessons learnt from this study can be adopted by other mines with legacy socio-environmental issues to build and maintain their ‘Social License to Operate’ through having a robust integrated community engagement system.

References

1. Atkinson D, et al. (2016) Impacts on the Social Fabric. Accessed on the internet http://seasgd.csir.co.za on 30/08/17
2. Benchmarks Foundation (2014), South African Coal Mining: Corporate Grievance Mechanisms, Community Engagement Concerns and Mining Impacts. South Africa, Benchmarks Foundation.
3. Bogdan, R.C. and Biken, S.K. (2003), Qualitative Research for Education: An introduction to Theories and Methods (4thed). New York, Pearson Education Group.
4. Burnard P, et al. (2008), Analysing and Presenting Qualitative Data. Accessed on internet http://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov on 7/10/17
5. Business Council of British Columbia (BCBC) (2015), Rethinking Social License to Operate-A Concept in Search of Definition and Boundaries. Published in the Environment and Energy Bulletin.
6. Dalaibuyan, B. (2012), Mining, ‘Social License’ and Local Level Agreement in Mongolia. Center for Social Responsibility in Mining University, Queensland, Australia.
7. Dare, M.L. et al. (2014), Community Engagement and Social License to Operate. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal
8. Deloitte (2016), Tracking the 2016: The Top 10 Issues Mining Companies Will Face in the Coming Year. Accessed on internet http://www2.deloitte.com on 11/12/17.
9. Denzin, N.K. and Lincoln, Y.S. (2000), Handbook of Qualitative Research. Vol.236, (2nd ed), Sage Publications
10. Draman, R. (2003), Poverty and Conflict in Africa: Explaining Complex Relationship. For Experts Group Meeting on Africa- Canada Parliamentary Strengthening Programme. Addis Ababa.
11. Ernest and Young Consultants (2014), Business Risks Facing Mining and Metals 2014-2015. Accessed on internet https://www.ey.com/miningmetals on 11/12/17.
12. Ernest and Young Consultants (2015), Business Risks Facing Mining and Metals 2015-2016. Accessed on internet https://www.ey.com/miningmetals on 11/12/17.
13. Ernest and Young Consultants (2016), The Top 10 Risks for Business: A Sector- Wide View of the Risks Facing Business Across the Globe. Accessed on internet: http://www.ey.com/businessrisk2010 on 19/12/16.
14. Evans, G. et al. (2002), Moving Mountains: Communities Confront Mining and Globalization. Sydney, Zed Books.
15. Family Health International (2011) Qualitative Research Methods: A Data Collector’s Field Guide. Accessed on Internet http://www.fhi.org on 25/12/17.
16. Flynn, S.I. (2009), Relative Deprivation Theory in Sociology a Reference Guide.https://wiki.zirve.edu.tr/sandbox/groups/economicsand administrativesciences/wiki/0edb9/attachments/0d145/Flynn.pdf?sessionID =8940d4002f706e131a7b4041f136555e3b9837d4
17. Franks, D.M. et al. (2010), Technology Futures Discussion Paper: Technology Assessment and the CSIRO Minerals Down Under National Research Flagship. Retrieved from Center for Social Responsibility in Mining: http://www.csrm.uq.edu.au/publications/technology-futures-discussion-paper
18. Gurr, T. (2011), Why Men Rebel Redux: How Valid are its Arguments on? Accessed on internet www.e-ir.info on 07/10/17
19. International Council on Mining and Metals (ICMM) (2014), Enhancing Mining’s Contribution to the Zambian Economy and Society. Mining Partnerships for Development- Spot Series 18.
20. Joyce, S. and Thomson, I. (2000), Earning a Social License to Operate: Social Acceptability and Resource Development in Latin America. Canadian Mining and Metallurgical Bulletin. Vol. 93. Accessed on internet on https://oncommonground.ca/wp on 30/11/17.
21. Lloyd, D. et al. (2013), Community Perspectives of Natural Resource Extraction: Coal-Seam Gas Mining and Social Identity in Eastern Australia. Vol. 10. Coolabah, Southern Cross University. Accessed on internet on www.epubs.scu.edu.au on 24/08/16.
22. Maxwell, J.A. (2005), Qualitative Research Design: An Interactive Approach. (2nd ed), Journal: Scientific Approach. Sage, Thousand Oaks.
23. Mitchell, G. and McManus, P. (2013), Engaging Communities for Success: Social Impact Assessment and Social License to Operate at NorthParkes Mines. NSW. Journal: Australian Geographer 44(4) pp 435-459. Accessed on internet http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00049182.2013.852502.
24. McLeod, S. (2008), Social Identity Theory. Retrieved from www.simplypsychology.org/social-identity-theory.hmtl
25. Moffat, K. and Zhang, A. (2013), The Paths to Social License to Operate: An Integrative Model Explaining Community Acceptance of Mining. Common Wealth Science and Industrial Research Organization. Vol. 39.
26. Owen, J.R. and Kemp, D. (2012), Social License and Mining: A Critical Perspective. Resources Policy. Accessed on internet: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/resourpol.2012on 6/12/16.
27. Patton, M.Q. (1990), Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods, 2nd edition. Sage, Newbury Park.
28. Pettigrew, T. F. (2015), Samuel Stouffer and Relative Deprivation. Vol. 78 (1). Accessed on internet http://spqr.sagepub.com on 26/09/16.
29. Prno, J. (2013), An Analysis of Factors Leading to the Establishment of a Social License to Operate in the Mining Industry. Resource Policy 38(4), pp 577-590. Accessed on Internet http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2013.09.010.
30. Prno, J. and Slocombe, D.S. (2012), Exploring the Origins of ‘Social License to Operate’ in the Mining Sector: Perspectives from Governance and Sustainability Theories. Resource Policy 37(2012) 346-357. Accessed on internet http://www.elsevier.com/locate/resourcepol.
31. RepRisk (2012), Most Controversial Mining Companies of 2011. Accessed from internet http://www.platform.reprisk.co.
32. Runciman, W. G. (1966), Relative Deprivation and Social Justice: A Study of Attitudes to Social Inequality in Twentieth-Century England. Berkley: University of California Press.
33. Spears, R. (2011), Group Identities: The Social Identity Perspective. Handbook of Identity Theory and Research. In Lloyd D, Luke H and Boyd W.E (2013) Community Perspectives of Natural Resource Extraction: Coal-Seam Gas Mining and Social Identity in Eastern Australia. Vol. 10. Coolabah, Southern Cross University. Accessed on internet on www.epubs.scu.edu.au on 24/08/16.
34. Stake, R. (1994), Case Studies. In: Denzin, N. and Lincoln, Y. (eds) (2005), Handbook of Qualitative Research. Sage, London.
35. Tajfel, H. (1974), ‘Social Identity and Intergroup Behaviour’ Some Prospects of Inter Group Behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology.
36. Thomson, I. and Boutilier, R.G. (2011), Social License to Operate. In Darling, P. (Ed.), SME Mining Engineering Handbook. Littleton, CO: Society for Mining, Metallurgy and Exploration.
37. Thomson, I. and Joyce, S. (2008), The Social License to Operate: What it is and Why it Seems so Difficult to Obtain? PDAC Convention, Toronto.
38. Turner, J. and Giles, H. (eds) (1981) Inter Group Behaviour. Oxford; Blackwell.
39. Wang, L., Kwame, A. O., Que, S. and Yang, W. (2016), Eliciting Drivers of Community Perceptions of Mining Projects Through Effective Community Engagement. Retrieved on Internet on 30/08/18: http://www.mpdi.com
40. Yin, K. (2009), Case Study Research Design and Methods 4th ed. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks.