Effects of Different Levels of a Locally Made Probiotic (BiolatemTM ) Administered via Drinking Water on Growth Performance of Broiler Chickens

  • Francisco Kanyinji THE UNIVERSITY OF ZAMBIA, SCHOOL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES, DEPARTMENT OF ANIMAL SCIENCE
  • Harrison Lungu
  • Jonas Wiza Ng'ambi
  • Kolawale Odubute
  • Josep Simbaya
  • Oswin C Chibinga
Keywords: Biolatem™ as a growth promoter, Ross 308 broiler chickens.

Abstract

This study aimed at determining the growth performance of broiler chickens offered varying amounts of a locally made probiotic (Biolatem™) in drinking water. One hundred and ninety-two (192) day-old chicks were bought from a local hatchery, and divided into four groups (n = 48). The groups were randomly allocated to four levels of Biolatem™ via drinking water (i.e., 0, 5, 8 and 10mL of Biolatem™ per 5L of drinking water). Both the water and feed were offered to the birds in all treatment groups ad libitum from 0 – to 42 days of age. Feed and water intake was monitored daily, and body weights were assessed at 0, 7, 14, 21, 28, 35 and 42 days of age. Weight gains and feed conversion ratios were calculated weekly. Generally, birds that received Biolatem™ in water showed higher (p < 0.05) total weight gains, daily weight gains and final body weights at 42 days of age than those that consumed water without Biolatem™. Among birds that received Biolatem™, those that were offered 8mL of Biolatem™ per 5L of drinking water had better performance (p < 0.05) in the variables assessed. It was concluded that Biolatem™ positively influenced the growth performance of the broiler chickens, and the best performance was exhibited by birds that were consuming water with 8mL of Biolatem™ per 5L in it.

References

Ahmad I. 2004. Effect of probiotic (Protexin) on the growth of broilers with special reference to the small intestinal crypt cells proliferation. (Thesis). University of Peshawar., Centre of Biotechnology.
Alkhalf, A. 2010. Influence of probioti c supplementa tion on blood parameter s and growth performance in broiler chicken s. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences, 17, 219 –225.
Altaher Y, Jahromi M, Ebrahim R, Zulkifli I, and Liang J. 2015. Lactobacillus Pentosus Ita23 and L. Acidipiscis Ita44 Enhance Feed Conversion Efficiency and Beneficial Gut Microbiota in Broiler Chickens. Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science, 17(2), 159–164.
Anjum M, Khan A, Azim A, and Afzal, M. 2005. Effect of dietary supplementation of multi strain probiotic on broiler growth performance. P. Pakistan Veterinary Journal, 25(1), 25–29.
Bajagai YS. 2016. Probiotics in animal nutrition – Production, impact and regulation. Rome: FAO Animal Production and Health.
Hajati, H., and Rezaei, M. 2010. The application of probiotics in poultry production. International Journal of Poultry Science, 9(3), 298–304.
Huang M K, Choi YJ, Houde R, Lee J, Le, B, and Zhao X. 2004. Effects of Lactobacilli and an acidophilic fungus on the production performance and immune responses in broiler chickens. Poultry Science, 83(5), 788–795.
Jadhav K, Sharma KS, Katoch S, Sharma V, and Mane BG. 2015. Probiotics in Broiler Poultry Feeds: A Review. Journal of Animal Nutrition and Physiology, 1, 04–16.
Lin J, Hunkapiller AA, Layton AC, Chang YJ, and Robbins KR. 2013. Response of intestinal microbiota to antibiotic growth promoters in chickens. Foodborne Pathology and Diseases, 10: 331-337.
Mehdi Y, Letourneau-Montiminy MP, Gaucher ML, Chorfi Y, and Suresh G. 2018. Use of antibiotics in broiler production: Global impacts and alternatives. Animal Nutrition, 4: 170-178.
Musukwa NM. 2019. Effects of ficus sycomorus bark on performance, nutrient digestibility, intestinal morphology and liver toxicity indicators in broilers. PhD Thesis. University of Zambia Library. Lusaka.
Okoli CJ, KF Chah, PTE Ozoh, and Udedibie ABI. 2005. Anti-microbial resistance profile of E. coli isolates from free range chickens. Online Journal of Health and Allied Science, Vol. 4.
Panda AK, Reddy MR, Rao SVR, and Praharaj NK. 2000. Growth, Carcass characteristic, immunocompetence and response to Escherichia coli of broilers fed diets with various levels of probiotics. Archiv Fur Geflugelkunde, 64: 152-156.
Patel SJ, Wellington M, Shah RM, and Ferreira MJ. 2020. Antibiotic stewardship in food-producing animals; Challenges, Progress and Opportunities. Clinical Theory, 42: 1649-1658.
Patil AK. 2015. Probiotics as Feed Additives in Weaned Pigs: A Review. Livestock Research International, 3(2), 31–39.
Ramatla T, Ngoma L, Adetunji M, and Mwanza M. 2017. Evaluation of Antibiotic Residues in Raw Meat Using Different Analytical Methods. Antibiotics, 6, 34; DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics6040034
Ronquillo MG and Hernandez JCA. 2017. Antibiotic and synthetic growth promoters in animal diets: A review of impact and analytical methods. Food control, 72: 255-267.
SAS Institute. 2002. User’s Guide. Version 9.1 Edition, Cary, NC, USA.
Shabani R.2012. The Effect of Probiotics on Growth Performance of Broilers. Annals of Biological Research, 3(12), 5450–5452.
Shokryazdan P, Jahrom, M, Liang J, Ramasamy K, Sieo C, and Ho Y.(2017. Effects of a Lactobacillus salivarius mixture on performance, intestinal health and serum lipids of broiler chickens. Institute of Tropical Agriculture, 12(5), e0175959.
Song D. 2012. Recent Application of Probiotics in Food and Agricultural Science. North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University, Greensboro, NC, USA.
Torok VA, Allison GE, Percy NJ, Ophel-Keller K, and Hughes RJ. 2011. Influence of antimicrobial feed additives on broiler commensal post hatch gut microbiota development and performance. Applied Environmental Microbiology, 77: 3380-3390.
Published
2023-11-27
How to Cite
1.
Kanyinji F, Lungu H, Ng’ambi J, Odubute K, Simbaya J, Chibinga O. Effects of Different Levels of a Locally Made Probiotic (BiolatemTM ) Administered via Drinking Water on Growth Performance of Broiler Chickens. University of Zambia Journal of Agricultural and Biomedical Sciences [Internet]. 27Nov.2023 [cited 25Jul.2024];7(2). Available from: https://journals.unza.zm/index.php/JABS/article/view/1120
Section
Agriculture Sciences