Assessment of the Effects of the Fertilizer Support Programme on Maize Productivity: A Chow-test approach.
Keywords:
Marginal Productivity, Chow test, Maize, Zambia, Fertilizer Support Programme
Abstract
In an effort to alleviate poverty and increase the incomes of millions of rural Zambia that depend on agriculture, the Zambian government has been implementing the Fertilizer Support Programme since 2002. Since then, the allocations to the FSP have been increasing despite claims that the programme has not been achieving the intended objectives. Unlike other studies conducted on the subject, this study used time series data to assess the effects of the fertilizer support programme on maize productivity. The methodology involved the use of tests of structural breaks (Chow-test) as a device for identifying discontinuities in the data which potentially represent treatment effects. The paper used data from the FAO database on national production and area under production between 1990 and 2010 (a period that covers the pre — FSP period (1990-2001) and post-FSP (2002-2010). The results showed that there has been a significant difference in the marginal productivity of land between the two periods (l .857 tons/hectare for the pre — FSP period compared to 2.219 tons/hectare for the post — FSP period) at the five percent significant level. The conclusion is that even though the FSP has resulted in significant increase in marginal productivity over the period in question, the question still remains whether the cost of the programme can be justified by the observed increase in marginal productivity.References
1. ACF/FSRP (2011) Analysis of the 2010/2011 National Agricultural Budget. Working Breakfast Presentation, Pamodzi Hotel, Lusaka
2. Ministry of Finance and National Planning (2010), the 2010/2011 Budget Speech presented to Parliament by Honorable Minister of Finance, Dr. Situmbeko Musokotwane
3. Burke W.J., Jayne T.S and Chapoto A. (2010) Factors Contributing to Zambia's 2010 Maize Bumper Harvest. Working Paper No. 48, Food Security Research Project, Lusaka,Zambia . Downloadable at http://www.aec.msu.edu
4. Minde, I. , Jayne, T.S., Crawford, E. , Ariga J. And Govereh J. (2008). Promoting Fertilizer Use in Africa: Current Issues and Empirical Evidence from Malawi Paper (PRSP): An Assessment Qfthe Implenæntation and Effectiveness of the Fertilizer Support Progrcumne. Civil Society for Poverty Reduction, Zambia.
5. World Bank (2010). Impact Assessment of the Fertilizer Support Programme, Analysis of Effectiveness and Efficiency, Report No. 58464, Sustainable Development departinent, Agricultural and Rural Development, Africa Region
6. Piehl, A. , S. Cooper, A. Braga and D. Kennedy. (2003).” Testing for Structural Breaks in the Evaluation of Programs." Review of Economics and Statistics, 85, pp. 550-558.
7. CSPR (2005) Targeting Smallholder Farmers in the Implementation of Zambia's Poverty Reduction Strategy
8. Lee W. and Suardi S. (2010) Minimum Wages and Employment: Reconsidering the use of a Time-Series approach as an evaluation tool. Discussion paper no 4748, Australia.
9. Gujarati, D. (2004). Basic Econometrics, 4th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
10. Field, A. (2005). Discovering Statistics Using SPSS, 2 Edition, SAGE Publications, London
11. FAO (2010) Online Statistical Database. Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Web Site www.fao.org.
12. Zambia National Farmers Union (2009). Zambia in 203,271 MT Maize Surplus. Downloadable at http://www.ZNFU.org.zm
2. Ministry of Finance and National Planning (2010), the 2010/2011 Budget Speech presented to Parliament by Honorable Minister of Finance, Dr. Situmbeko Musokotwane
3. Burke W.J., Jayne T.S and Chapoto A. (2010) Factors Contributing to Zambia's 2010 Maize Bumper Harvest. Working Paper No. 48, Food Security Research Project, Lusaka,Zambia . Downloadable at http://www.aec.msu.edu
4. Minde, I. , Jayne, T.S., Crawford, E. , Ariga J. And Govereh J. (2008). Promoting Fertilizer Use in Africa: Current Issues and Empirical Evidence from Malawi Paper (PRSP): An Assessment Qfthe Implenæntation and Effectiveness of the Fertilizer Support Progrcumne. Civil Society for Poverty Reduction, Zambia.
5. World Bank (2010). Impact Assessment of the Fertilizer Support Programme, Analysis of Effectiveness and Efficiency, Report No. 58464, Sustainable Development departinent, Agricultural and Rural Development, Africa Region
6. Piehl, A. , S. Cooper, A. Braga and D. Kennedy. (2003).” Testing for Structural Breaks in the Evaluation of Programs." Review of Economics and Statistics, 85, pp. 550-558.
7. CSPR (2005) Targeting Smallholder Farmers in the Implementation of Zambia's Poverty Reduction Strategy
8. Lee W. and Suardi S. (2010) Minimum Wages and Employment: Reconsidering the use of a Time-Series approach as an evaluation tool. Discussion paper no 4748, Australia.
9. Gujarati, D. (2004). Basic Econometrics, 4th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
10. Field, A. (2005). Discovering Statistics Using SPSS, 2 Edition, SAGE Publications, London
11. FAO (2010) Online Statistical Database. Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Web Site www.fao.org.
12. Zambia National Farmers Union (2009). Zambia in 203,271 MT Maize Surplus. Downloadable at http://www.ZNFU.org.zm
Published
2025-09-11
How to Cite
1.
Bwalya R. Assessment of the Effects of the Fertilizer Support Programme on Maize Productivity: A Chow-test approach. Journal of Agricultural and Biomedical Sciences [Internet]. 11Sep.2025 [cited 14Sep.2025];1(2):79-5. Available from: https://journals.unza.zm/index.php/JABS/article/view/1553
Section
Biomedical Sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright: ©️ JABS. Articles in this journal are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.