Factors Affecting the Efficiency of Smallholder Cotton Producers in Zambia

Stephen Kabwe; Gelson Tembo; Thomson Kalinda

doi:10.53974/unza.jabs.1.1.332

Stephen Kabwe UNZA School of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Agricultural Economic & Extension Studies, University of Zambia. P.O. Box 32379, Lusaka, Zambia
Gelson Tembo UNZA School of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Agricultural Economic & Extension Studies, University of Zambia. P.O. Box 32379, Lusaka, Zambia
Thomson Kalinda UNZA School of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Agricultural Economic & Extension Studies, University of Zambia. P.O. Box 32379, Lusaka, Zambia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.53974/unza.jabs.1.1.332

Keywords: Technical, Allocative, Economic Efficiency, Cotton, Zambia

Abstract

Agriculture in Sub-Sahara Africa is considered as an engine of economic growth and has the potential to reduce rural poverty of smallholder farmers through increased food security and household income. However, most of Sub-Sahara Africa countries are faced with low agricultural productivity and this has undermined the potential to reduce rural poverty. The study focused on smallholder cotton producers in Zambia. Cotton is grown in Central, Eastern and Southern Provinces of Zambia and is an important cash crop which contributes over $60 million to the economy. It also supports over 150,000 households. However, productivity of smallholder cotton farmers in Zambia is low, around 800 kg per hectare or less. While in West Africa productivity is over 1000 kg per hectare. Agricultural productivity is defined as a measure of value of output for a given level of inputs. Efficiency is defined as the actual productivity of a farm relative to a maximal potential productivity. This shows that efficiency is related to productivity though it is productivity at maximum or minimum values. The study used the 2008 supplemental survey data collected by the Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperatives, Central Statistics and Food Security Research Project. Using Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) this study determines the technical, allocative and economic efficiency indices of a sample of 812 (population estimates 150,801) cotton producers in Zambia. Using the Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) regression, the study determines the factors influencing technical, allocative and economic efficiency variations. Results show that the mean technical, allocative and economic efficiency indices in cotton production are 46%, 37% and 20% respectively. This means that Zambian cotton farmers could reduce input use and production cost without altering the output by improving technical and allocative efficiency by 54% and 63% respectively. Female headed households, number of years spent in school by the household head, leaving crop residues, value of productive assets and off farm income are some of the factors found to positively influence the technical, allocative and economic efficiency. The study found that cotton farmers are relatively inefficient and there is room to improve efficiency among smallholder cotton farmers in Zambia. Some socio-economic and farm specific factors have a positive influence on efficiency. The study recommends that cotton stakeholders should devise strategies of involving more women in cotton production, improve access to productive assets, and encourage adoption of conservation farming crop residue retention as the means to improve cotton production efficiency.

References

1. Frisvold G. & Ingram K. (1994). Source of Agricultural productivity growth and stagnation in Sub-Saharan Afrocan, Washington DC, USA.
2. Forum for Agricultural Research in Africa (FARA) 2006. Framework for African Agricultural Productivity / Cadre pour la productivité agricole en Afrique. Accra, Ghana. 72 pp.
3. Deininger, K. and Olinto, P. 2000. Why Liberalization Alone Has Not Improved Agricultural Productivity in Zambia: The Role of Asset Ownership and Working Capital Constraints.WorldBankPolicyResearchWorking Paper No. 2302.
4. Ministry of Finance & National Planning (MoFNP) 2006. Fifth National Development and Planning”, Lusaka, Zambia.
5. Farrell M. J (1957), The measurement of Productive Efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A(General), Vol. 120, No. 3, (1957), pp 253-290
6. Tschirley, D. and Kabwe, S. 2007. Cotton in Zambia: 2007 Assessment of its Organization, Performance, Current Policy Initiatives, and Challenges for the Future. FSRPWorking Paper No. 26. Lusaka, Zambia
7. Brambilla I. & Porto G. G. (2009). Market Structure, Outgrower Contracts and Farm Output. Evidence from Cotton Reforms in Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.
8. Tschirley, D., Poulton, C., and Lambaste, P. (2009). Organization and Performance of Cotton Sectors in Africa; Learning from Reform Performance. IBRD/The World Bank. D.C. USA.
9. Ngassam S. B., Nzomo J. C., and Neba C. (2010). The Determinants of the Technical Efficiency of Cotton Farmers in Northern Cameroon. University of Dschang.
10. Mohammad I. J. (2009). Efficiency Analysis of Cotton-Wheat and Rice-Wheat Systems in Punjab, Pakistan. Pakistan.
11. Mevlut G., Besir K., Erdal D., Goksel A. M. and Oguz P. (2009). Determination of technical efficiency in cotton growing farms in Turkey: Acase study of Cukurova region. Cukurova, Turkey.
12. Shafiq M. and Tahir R. (2000). The extent of resource use inefficiencies in cotton production in Pakistan's Punjab: an application of Data Envelopment Analysis. Agricultural Economics. Vol 22 (2000), pp 321-330.
13. Haggblade S.,Kabwe S. and Plerhoples C. 2010. ProductivityImpactofConservationFarmingonSmallholder Cotton Farmers in Zambia. Working Paper 47. Food Security Research Project (FSRP).
14. Jayne, T. S., and Argwings-Kodhek G. 1997. Consumer response to maize market liberalization in urban Kenya. Food Policy, Vol. 22, No. 5, pp. 447-458.
15. Hoff, A., 2007. “Second stage DEA: Comparison of approaches for modelling the DEAscore.” European Journal of Operational Research Vol. 181, 425-435.
16. McDonald J. 2008. “Using least squares and tobit in second stage DEAefficiency analyses.” European Journal of Operational Research Vol. 197, 792-798.
17. Banker, R.D., Natarajan R. 2008. “Evaluating contextual variables affecting productivity using Data Envelopment Analysis.” Operations Research Vol. 56, 48-58.
18. Chavas, J., Petrie, R., Roth, M., 2005. Farm household productionefficiency:evidencefromtheGambia.American Journal of Agricultural Economics 87:160-179.
19. Binam, J.N., Tonyè, J., Wandji, N., Nyambi, G., Akoa, M., 2004. Factors affecting the technical efficiency among smallholder farmers in the slash and burn agriculture zone of Cameroon. Food Policy 29, 531–545.
20. Fletschner, D. K. and Zepeda L. 2002. “Efficiency of small landholders in Eastern Paraguay.”Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 27(2):554 – 572.
21. Ajibefun, I. A. (2008). An evaluation of parametric and non-parametricmethodsoftechnicalefficiencymeasurement: application to small scale crop production in Nigeria. J. Agric. Soc. 4: 95-100.
22. Rios, A.R. and Shively G.E. (2005). Farm size non parametric efficiency measurements for coffee farms in Vietnam. Proc. AmericaAgriculturalEconomicsAssociationAnnualMeeting.24-27July2005,Providence, Rhode Island.
23. Coelli T., Rao S.P. and Battese G.E. (1998). An Introduction to efficiency and productivity analysis. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston.
24. Green H. W. 2003. “Econometrics Analysis, 4ed.” New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc.
25. Bravo-Ureta E. B. and Pinheiro E. A. (1997). Technical, Economic, and Allocative Efficiency in Peasant Farming: Evidence from the Dominican Republic. The Dev. Econ. 34: 48-67.
26. Dolisca F. and Curtis M. J. (2008). Technical Efficiency of Traditional and Non-Traditional Crop Production: ACase Study from Haiti. World Journal of Agricultural Sciences 4(4): 416-426
27. Islam K.M, Backman S., Sumelius J. (2011) Technical Economic and allocative efficiency of microfinance borrowers and non-borrowers: Evidence from Peasant Farming in Bangladesh.
28. Coelli T. and Battese G.E. 1996. “Identification of factors which influence the technical inefficiency of Indian farmers.” Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 40, No 2, pp 103-128
29. Chirwa W. E. 2007. “Sources of Technical Efficiency among Smallholder Maize Farmers in Southern Malawi.” AERC, Nairobi
30. Amos T. T. (2007). An Analysis of Productivity and Technical Efficiency of Smallholder Cocoa Farmers in Negeria. J. Soc. Sci., 15(2): 127-133
31. Nyagaka O. D., Obare A. G., Omiti M. J. and Nguyo W. (2010). Technical Efficiency in resource use: Evidence from smallholder Irish Potato Farmers in Nyandarua North District, Kenya. Africa Journal of Agricultural Research Vol 5(11), pp. 1179-1186
32. Brazdik F. (2006). Non-Parametric Analysis of Technical Efficiency: Factors Affecting Efficiency of West Java Rice Farms, Prague, Cech Republic
33. Okoye, B.C., Onyenweaku C.E., and Agwu A.E. 2006. “Technical Efficiency of Smallholder Cocoyam Farmers: ImplicationsforAgriculturalExtensionPolicy.”Anambra State, Nigeria
34. TchaleH.2009.“Theefficiencyofsmallholderagriculture in Malawi.” AFJARE Vol 3 No. 2 September 2009.
35. Mahdi N., Sghaier M., Bachta S. M. (2009). Technical efficiency of water use in the irrigated private schemes in Smar watershed, south-eastern Tunisia.
36. Bwalya R. (2007). Transaction Costs and Smallholder Household Access to Maize Markets in Central Province Zambia. Thesis, University of Makerere, Uganda.
37. Haggblade, S., Tembo, G. 2003. Development, diffusion and impact of conservation farming in Zambia. Working Paper No. 8. Lusaka, Zambia: Food Security Research Project.